All information on this site is provided by Mubite for educational purposes only, specifically related to financial market trading. It is not intended as an investment recommendation, business advice, investment opportunity analysis, or any form of general guidance on trading investment instruments. Trading in financial markets involves significant risk, and you should not invest more than you can afford to lose. Mubite does not offer any investment services as defined under the Capital Market Undertakings Act No. 256/2004 Coll. The content on this site is not directed toward residents in any country or jurisdiction where such information or use would violate local laws or regulations. Mubite is not a brokerage and does not accept deposits.
Mubite s.r.o., Skolska 660/3, ICO: 23221551 Prague 1, 110 00, Czech Republic | Copyright Ⓒ 2025 Mubite. All Rights Reserved.

It is December 2025, and one of the loudest narratives in crypto has quietly collapsed.
Just two years ago, the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States was celebrated as the final validation moment. Institutions were “here.” Price targets of $150,000 to $250,000 by Christmas 2025 were repeated across research notes, Twitter threads, and conference stages. Gold, by contrast, was dismissed as outdated. A barbarous relic. Something digital scarcity was supposed to replace.
Reality played out very differently.
Since the launch of Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, gold has surged roughly 58 percent, repeatedly printing new all time highs and pushing beyond $4,100 per ounce in November 2025. Bitcoin briefly spiked to around $109,000 in mid 2025, then collapsed more than 32 percent from the peak and now sits down year to date.
This divergence is not just a price story.
It is a macro, institutional trust, and risk management story, and it carries direct consequences for every crypto prop firm, every funded crypto trading account, and every trader focused on survival and consistency rather than narratives.
Central banks do not trade like retail participants on a crypto trading platform. They move slowly, conservatively, and with one overriding objective: preservation of monetary stability.
Gold has spent thousands of years building infrastructure that works at sovereign scale. Allocated vaults in London, Zurich, New York, and Singapore. Armored logistics. LBMA refiners. Transparent audit frameworks. Centuries of legal precedent governing ownership and custody.
When the People’s Bank of China decides to accumulate another 50 to 80 tonnes of gold, the process is routine. Delivery, assay, allocation. No operational uncertainty.
Bitcoin, by contrast, still lacks globally accepted custody standards that satisfy monetary authorities across geopolitical blocs. There is no unified institutional framework that central banks in Beijing, Riyadh, or Frankfurt are comfortable relying on.
Until that changes, Bitcoin remains a speculative asset in their eyes, not a reserve asset.
The global push toward de dollarization accelerated sharply in 2025. An expanded BRICS bloc, now including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Iran, and Ethiopia, has dramatically increased official gold purchases.
More importantly, gold is actively being used in bilateral trade settlement.
Russia and India partially settling energy trades through gold linked instruments
China and Saudi Arabia structuring energy deals with gold conversion options
Turkey and Iran using gold settlement channels to bypass SWIFT restrictions
These are not speculative narratives. They are documented in central bank disclosures and trade finance documentation.
By contrast, no major commodity is settled in Bitcoin at scale. No oil producer prices barrels in BTC. No global trade flow clears in Bitcoin.
For reserve status, theory matters less than usage. On that front, gold is winning decisively.
Bitcoin’s structural weakness in 2025 has been its extreme sensitivity to global liquidity.
When the U.S. Treasury General Account expanded aggressively during shutdown and debt ceiling stress, hundreds of billions of dollars were drained from the system. Risk assets suffered across the board.
Bitcoin suffered the most.
Why?
Because Bitcoin trades with embedded leverage. Between 70 and 80 percent of global BTC volume still flows through perpetual futures, many with leverage between 3x and 20x. When liquidity tightens, liquidations cascade.
Gold trades primarily on deep spot and forward markets. Physical bullion does not face margin calls. When liquidity dries up, gold bends. Bitcoin breaks.
For anyone involved in prop trading crypto, this distinction matters.
This is where opportunity emerges.
While Bitcoin struggled during liquidity contractions, tokenized gold instruments such as Tether Gold (XAUT) and Pax Gold (PAXG) delivered steady performance inside crypto markets.
Tokenized gold offers a unique hybrid:
1:1 backing by allocated physical gold in regulated vaults
24/7 trading inside crypto ecosystems
No weekend gaps
Fractional ownership
Use as collateral and perpetual contract underlying
For a crypto prop firm, this is not a novelty. It is a structural upgrade.
Platforms such as Mubite now allow traders to access XAUT perpetuals, combining leverage with an underlying asset aggressively accumulated by central banks and sovereign funds. This creates a rare alignment between institutional flows and prop trading opportunity.
Instead of fighting liquidity contractions, traders can position alongside them.
A crypto prop firm that remains Bitcoin only in 2025 is exposing itself to unnecessary drawdown risk.
Firms that adapted fastest this year made several key changes:
Added tokenized gold to correlation and volatility models
Reduced maximum Bitcoin leverage during known liquidity drain periods
Built signals around Treasury liquidity, Fed reverse repo usage, and funding stress
Allowed funded crypto trading accounts to deploy capital across non BTC instruments
Some firms have even begun experimenting with gold denominated drawdown logic, measuring risk in XAUT terms rather than USD to reduce volatility clustering.
This is not ideology. It is risk management.
Technology alone does not create trust. Monetary trust compounds over centuries.
Leverage amplifies fragility during liquidity shocks.
Macro liquidity always overrides narrative.
Diversification inside crypto now includes real world assets, not just tokens.
Crypto prop trading in 2025 is no longer about maximalism. It is about adaptability.
No.
Bitcoin still holds long term asymmetric upside, particularly during future fiat confidence crises. In hyperinflationary economies, Bitcoin already functions better than gold for daily value transfer.
But at the global reserve and institutional allocation level, Bitcoin is still early.
Gold is not winning because it is innovative. It is winning because it is trusted, neutral, and already embedded in global settlement infrastructure.
Savvy traders do not argue with that reality. They trade it.
Allocate a meaningful portion of risk capital to tokenized gold instruments
Monitor U.S. liquidity metrics as closely as price charts
Choose a crypto prop trading firm that allows multi asset strategies
Use gold perpetuals for steadier PnL during high volatility macro regimes
Preserve capital now to compound aggressively when liquidity returns
Surviving 2025 is the real edge.
2025 is not the year Bitcoin failed.
It is the year the market accepted that replacing a 5,000 year old monetary asset takes more than one bull cycle and a few ETFs.
Gold is not beating Bitcoin because it has better marketing.
It is beating Bitcoin because the largest pools of capital on Earth trust it with real settlement.
For traders operating inside a crypto prop firm, the message is simple:
Trade what institutions accumulate.
Manage risk like capital matters.
And use platforms built for serious traders, not narratives.
In 2025, the most powerful form of digital gold is not Bitcoin.
It is gold itself, tokenized, leveraged, and traded 24/7 by professionals.